The Autumn/Winter 2011-12 Paris Fashion Week may end up being remembered as the season that changed the face of fashion not for the designs included in the shows, but for some major and minor earthquakes that took place at some of the main fashion houses.
Dior first suspended Galliano after his anti-Semitic remarks, then fired him after a video circulating on the Internet showed a previous incident in which he launched into a drunk Hitler-loving rant in a bar.
In the meantime, Balmain's Christophe Decarnin had a nervous breakdown and gossips spread about Riccardo Tisci replacing Galliano at Dior, Haider Ackermann moving to Givenchy, and Hedi Slimane going to Yves Saint Laurent with Carine Roitfeld consulting (so this was what she had in mind when she left French Vogue...)
Maybe stylist, fashion editor and Mugler Creative Director Nicola Formichetti had a crystal ball when he entitled his first womenswear collection for Mugler “Anatomy of Change”.
Though you wonder if Formichetti's crystal ball can also predict the future of the brand he is directing at the moment.
His long-awaited collection created in collaboration with designer Sébastien Peigné and showcased with the help of Lady Gaga as music director, opened with suits characterised by sculpted silhouettes that called back to mind Mugler’s strong peaked shoulders from the ‘80s.
Then the mood changed, verging towards the sensual with revealing sheer tops and body-suits, one-shoulder jackets, deconstructed pieces, rigid plastic armours, corsets and latex bras and trousers.
Most of the looks – in a palette comprising black, white, beige and blue – were matched with precarious heels and with Rein Vollenga’s wearable sculptures.
Yet, after Lady Gaga modelled two outfits, sashaying down the runway, smoking, clawing at the air and clutching the church columns that flanked the runway in a long blonde wig, a sheer body suit and impossibly high (read 60 cm) heelless shoes, the attention shifted from the clothes to her, turning the catwalk show into a fun party.
Yet if you reversed the attention to the clothes and didn't get distracted by the
Keith Flint-like double-mohican hairstyle (View this photo) you distinctively realised that, while Mugler’s woman was a sort of sensual android, the fashion house's new woman is a post-human android that doesn’t seem to have the deeply disturbing yet irresistible charm of Mugler’s robots or the elegance of experimental replicants à la Rachael out of Blade Runner.
So while the womenswear collection was spared the oppressive dark moods and death references of the menswear collection (though Rick Genest and his scary tattoos reappeared once again on this runway…), it brought with it quite a few doubts.
Were these garments created with the sole purpose of making stylists/pop stars and bizarre celebrities happy?
There aren’t indeed too many contexts in which an ordinary woman could wear these pieces that are allegedly meant to empower you and make you feel fierce.
Besides, apart from the fact that some materials didn't look exactly luxurious, proper tailors will tell you the trousers were badly cut.
There is something that deeply worries me about all this Mugler-Formichetti-Gaga shenanigan, the influence that all this is having on young fashion design students and on contemporary designers as well.
The former are probably thinking now that the only thing they will have to do in life is dress a pop icon to make sure they can set up a fashion label; the latter are increasingly getting concerned about dressing Lady Gaga (think about Francesco Scognamiglio), slightly forgetting there are millions of ordinary women out there who may need a reasonably functional yet striking wardrobe.
Formichetti was honest, though, and stated that this collection is not about the clothes. Yet, you could argue, a fashion house must be at some point about the clothes, because it is supposed to be selling clothes apart from accessories and fragrances.
If a fashion brand is not about saleable items, but it’s about a vision, a dream or an idea, it turns into a financially undesirable business and, at some point, it collapses.
Gaga claimed she has already bought the collection, but will more customers – among them ordinary women – follow her and will the collection also feature more wearable pieces like sensible suits once it will be in the shops?
Besides, how long will it work using Lady Gaga as an advertising board and as a distraction from the clothes?
The doubts remain. In the meantime if, like me, you’re a sensible grown up, you’re past 27 and working passionately in the fashion industry, you may as well find yourself another job.
As stated at the beginning of this post, the fashion industry is going like Mugler’s woman through some major changes.
Even in the last 48 hours fashion has dramatically mutated, turning into a strange creature that walks in shoes that aren’t definitely made for walking and into a place where styling is more important than tailoring and artisans are less important than pop stars.
If this is the trendy, edgy, funky and irresistible fashion scene of the future, maybe buying a ticket out of it wouldn’t be an option, but a total relief.
Member of the Boxxet Network of Blogs, Videos and Photos
Member of the Boxxet Network of Blogs, Videos and Photos
Add to Technorati Favorites
Lijit Search